Malcolm Bradbury: Novels

Malcolm Bradbury: NovelsĀ 

From his intro (2000) to Murdoch’s The Philosopher’s Pupil:

[In the 1950s] Novels had meanings. Novelists had minds and consciences, not personalities, and a vision of life, not a life-style.

The novel could keep company with significant matters: the labyrinths of freedom, the nature of consciousness, the problems of perception and of picturing consciousness and such matters as the meaning of art, the quest for personal salvation and the nature of the good.

  

4 Responses to Malcolm Bradbury: Novels »»


Comments

  1. tom
    Comment by tom | 2006/04/12 at 00:32:58Quote

    Now here’s a paradox. I couldn’t agree with Malc more in regard to trendy writing, but at the same time I dislike Murdoch’s fiction. I don’t find her novels intellectually challenging at all.

  2. Comment by Administrator | 2006/04/12 at 03:05:42Quote

    I don’t want to agree with you just yet, because I am still working my way through the novels. I’ve read Under the Net, Jackson’s Dilemma, and The Philosopher’s Pupil. I’ve got The Good Apprentice on standby and Wendy V. has suggested, if I remember correctly, The Sacred and Profane Love Machine and The Sea, The Sea. But I have to say that my initial reaction to reading her novels is quite similar to yours. I’m not saying I dislike her fiction, I haven’t really read enough to make such a comment, but, but, but, the plots, for one thing, are so overwhelming! I shall persist, however, because I want to adore her. (Now, that’s a funny way to approach a novelist.) So, let’s keep this conversation open….

  3. tom
    Comment by tom | 2006/04/12 at 05:25:23Quote

    I think The Sea, The Sea is a good novel.

  4. Comment by kathryn | 2006/04/12 at 09:11:03Quote

    I’m looking forward to reading it. Hopefully I’ll catch up with all the things I want to read this summer.


Leave a Reply »»

Quote selected text