Rational love: Not mad at all
Love - romantic, passionate, erotic love - is often portrayed, understood, or lived as a type of madness. Scientists reveal chemical imbalances, psychologists classify it with various disorders, but while reading an old interview with Martha Nussbaum called “The Ethics of Literature” (sorry, no reference, it just exists as a dog-eared photocopied text found in a folder marked ‘personal’) I am reminded of the rational basis of this most misunderstood emotion.
Nussbaum, referring back to Aristotle, says:
…emotions such as love, grief and anger are based upon reasoning about what’s valuable, and in fact are suffused with reasoning.
And then, something from William Hazlitt:
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference between what things are and what they ought to be.
Falling in love then is surely a philosophical act, an act of reason. In falling in love we are acting to improve our life. Life with the object of our love is valued more than life without our love object. When we fall in love, we are concerned with the ‘good’ and how to live a good life. In this sense, falling in love is also an ethical act.
Posted by By: kathryn |
